Prof. Peter L. Galison

Joseph Pellegrino University Professor
professional headshot of Peter Galison
Personal Website

Areas of Research: Digital Humanities / Digital Histories, History of Environmental Sciences, History of Physical Sciences, Material Culture, Media Studies, Museum Studies, Philosophy of Science, Science & Technology Studies

In 1997, Peter Galison was named a John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Fellow; in 1999, he was a winner of the Max Planck Prize given by the Max Planck Gesellschaft and Humboldt Stiftung.

Galison is interested in the intersection of philosophical and historical questions such as these: What, at a given time, convinces people that an experiment is correct? How do scientific subcultures form interlanguages of theory and things at their borders?

More broadly, Galison's main work explores the complex interaction between the three principal subcultures of twentieth century physics--experimentation, instrumentation, and theory. The volume on experiment, How Experiments End (University of Chicago Press, 1987), and that on instruments, Image and Logic (University of Chicago Press, 1997), are to be followed by the final volume, "Building, Crashing, Thinking," that is still under construction. Einstein's Clocks, Poincaré's Maps (W.W. Norton, 2003) begins the study of theory by focusing on the ways in which the theory of relativity stood at the crossroads of technology, philosophy, and physics. Image & Logic won the Pfizer Award from the History of Science Society in October 1998.

In addition, Galison has launched several projects examining the powerful cross-currents between science and other fields. His book (with Lorraine Daston), Objectivity (Zone Books, 2007) asks how visual representation shaped the concept of scientific objectivity, and how atlases of scientific images continue, even today, to rework what counts as right depiction. Further work on the boundary between science and other fields includes his co-edited volumes on the relations between science, art and architecture, The Architecture of Science (MIT Press, 1999; ed. with Emily Thompson) and Picturing Science, Producing Art (Routledge, 1998; ed. with Caroline Jones), as well as Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research (Stanford University Press, 1992; ed. with Bruce Hevly), The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power (Stanford University Press, 1996; ed. with David J. Stump), Atmospheric Flight in the Twentieth Century (Kluwer, 2000; ed. with Alex Roland), Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science (Routledge, 2003; ed. with Mario Biagioli), and Einstein for the 21st Century: His Legacy in Science, Art, and Modern Culture (Princeton University Press, 2008; ed. with Gerald Holton and Silvan S. Schweber).

His courses include: "History and Philosophy of 20th-Century Physics;" "History and Philosophy of Experimentation;" "Fascism, Art and Science in the Interwar Years;" "Scientific Realism;" "The Einsteinian Revolution;" seminars on Critical History and on the History and Philosophy of Theory in 20th Century Physics; and "Filming Science." Additionally, he leads weekly meetings of Harvard's Physical Sciences Research Group where students, faculty, and staff have the opportunity to present and discuss relevant topics in the history of science including the history of mathematics and the history of technology.

Courses

Prof. Galison has recently taught the following courses in the department.

Collaborative Scientific Knowledge

Scientific knowledge does not spring whole into being like Athena from the head of Zeus, full grown and armored.  Instead, it depends on networks and affiliations, bonded communities of experimenters, instrument makers, and theorists.  We will begin with attention to early modern structures—the 18th century Republic of Letters and the alliance of 19th century geologists, naturalists, natural theologians, and museum curators.  The course then turns to the growth of large-scale collaborations: World War II weapons work on radar and the atomic bomb;  the ever-expanding particle-physics groups at Fermilab and CERN; the complex alliance of science, industry, government, and engineering;  scientifically directed space missions.  How, we ask, does decision-making take shape in a collective world of hundreds—even thousands—of scientists?  How and when does democratic deliberation function in an epistemic context?  How does knowledge from collaborations differ across scientific domains?  Using primary sources, historical studies, social-scientific explorations, and philosophical inquiry—with the aid of group leaders invited to the course--we aim here to understand, and perhaps to intervene in the way collective reason does and ought function.

Filming Science

Examination of the theory and practice of capturing scientific practice on film. Topics will include fictional, documentary, informational, and instructional films and raise problems emerging from film theory, visual anthropology and science studies. Each student will make and edit short film(s) about laboratory, field, or theoretical scientific work.

Einstein Changes Our World

Albert Einstein is the most famous figure in science, ever.  Following his physics, cultural, philosophical, and political trajectory, this seminar aims to track the shifting role of science in the 20th and 21st centuries. This first-year seminar addresses Einstein's engagement with special and general relativity, quantum mechanics, Nazism, nuclear weapons, philosophy, the arts, and technology, and it raises basic questions about physics in its broader history.  For students coming with backgrounds in arts, humanities, and social sciences, the seminar will link their interests to the sciences; for those more focused on physics in particular and science more generally, it will frame those interests within a broader context of war, architecture, and film. Did you know Einstein had a patent on a refrigerator?  That he did a groundbreaking, delicate experiment about magnets while coming up with radical ideas about gravity, displacing Newton?  That every time you flick on a navigation program to bike somewhere you are testing general relativity?  

“Einstein Changes Our World” will present a mix of science (no prerequisites!—we get to the relativity of time, for example, with no more than the thought experiment of two mirrors and a flash of light) and the broader, relevant cultural surround. Some weeks will examine physics concepts, like curved space, or current work on black holes—while others will have us watching films or discussing the modernist poetry of William Carlos Williams that took off from relativity. Or we might be looking at the philosophical roots and philosophical consequences of Einstein’s works.  At other times we will be fully engaged with historical and political questions: not least, the building, detonation, and proliferation of nuclear weapons.  So: Why Einstein?  Because his work is still changing our world.

Latour and his Interlocutors

This course will follow major debates and transformations in the history of Science and Technology Studies and allied fields by tracing the works of Bruno Latour through the network of his interlocutors. Topics will include early and later forays into history, anthropology, and laboratory studies, the emergence of Actor-Network Theory, the study of the Anthropocene, as well as engagements between STS scholarship and the arts.

Scientific Visualization

Visualization has been central to the development of science over the last 400 years, from Galileo to black holes. From diagrams and thought experiments through traces, photographs and film, the ability to picture, and reproduce, images of scientific phenomena has shaped our understanding of the natural world. This course will explore that history, philosophy, and sociology; how the scientific image has shaped standards of demonstration, opened up new ways of knowing, and accompanied the development of the very idea of objectivity.

Knowledge Production and the University in the Age of AI

Faculty Seminar

At this time of seismic change for the university, and the research systems of which we are a central part, it is hard to find a moment to pause and ask: how should we make knowledge in the future?

18th century watercolor view of harvard